Isn’t that what coronavirus is doing?
Yes some people may be asymptomatic but this can be due to any number of reasons.
4 Likes
It’s affecting people differently
This can be for any number of reasons
This is a strain of coronavirus we are not yet used to
But as far as I can tell it is acting as a normal virus 
4 Likes
Such as?
1 Like
It is but not everyone is getting sick. If you get sick you get sick. You at least show some symptoms…
1 Like
Yes when you’re sick your sick but carrying the virus doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll display symptoms. There is a difference.
3 Likes
For starters, do some people have no symptoms and others do? I mean if it’s a natural virus then surly everyone would get sick, even those with the strongest immune system.
Second: why do some people get VERY sick and others dont. Yes natural viruses do that but not to this extend. To me it looks like it was designed to attack certain DNA molecules while others hardly ever get sick. Doesn’t it bother you and make you ask questions?
Source: Redirect Notice
This can be due to any number of reasons
2 Likes
But surly at some point you will display symptoms. You can incubate a virus for a while before it makes you sick. Which makes me wonder why people never display symptoms at all and don’t get sick even when they have it
1 Like
That maybe true. But surly at some point you start to get sick too 
I don’t believe it is fake; however, I disagree with a lot of the methods that are being used to stop it from spreading, because they seem very illogical.
So let’s say that a country goes into total lockdown for three months and aren’t allowed to leave the house. After this, schools reopen and suddenly there is a spike of new cases. If everyone stayed home two weeks prior to the reopening of schools, then how come there are all these ‘new cases’? Who spread the virus if no one left their house during this time? And why were there so many cases when we were in complete lockdown?
Plus, total lockdown has affected a lot of people economically. Of course, many larger businesses have home delivery service where you can do your grocery shopping online, or have food delivered to your house. But what about small corner stores or independent boutiques? What about the people that work bagging groceries? For seven months, grocery stores in my country did not have people bagging at the registers. They just came back to work a few weeks ago.
Now, I completely support taking precautions such as not letting too many people in stores or restaurants at a time, wearing masks, and constantly washing our hands. But did total lockdown eliminate the virus? If we all take precautions, won’t that help stop the spread of the virus as well?
I know a lot of people will probably disagree with me, especially on the schools (partially) reopening part. But online classes will never take the place of in-person classes, especially not in elementary nor middle school.
2 Likes
It did not which makes me think that there’s a bigger agenda behind the scenes. I mean why are some countries refusing to share their research with others. Surly if you wanted to get rid of the whole thing, you’d be sharing your findings with everyone. And I’ve never EVER seen a pandemic where people were STOPPED from living their lives and trapped like rats in cages. Doesn’t it make you think why?
1 Like
Because for some people the virus just doesn’t display itself, this isn’t odd behaviour for a virus
And again, this can be due to any number of external and internal reasons
2 Likes
If that was true, what’s the point in lockdown? What’s the point in “trying to stop a virus” from circulating if it’s behaving like any normal virus. You can’t stop a virus and it won’t go away. So people are expected to put their lives on hold?
1 Like
Because we don’t know alot about the virus
It’s very contagious and some people have died due to reasons related to it. It’s a different kind of flu that we don’t know much about yet. This doesn’t mean it’s not a natural virus.
2 Likes
The reason I didn’t say they died from it directly is because alot of people who had died also had other problems which the virus didn’t help with
1 Like
I will say it has been handled terribly
But again, this doesn’t make the virus synthetic
1 Like
Nope. I agree with you. Lockdown was just to habituate the people to a new ‘norm’. It’s not a method to eliminate a virus. A virus doesn’t eliminate itself naturally unless you have some elimination weapon type thingy used against it.
It will! It’s not about social distancing, it’s about physical distancing. We need to go by the SOPs in a disciplined manner as issued by the government and follow the sanitization norms.
My thoughts as well. People in senior school are mature enough to take part in online classes seriously but kids in primary and middle school need some form of physical interaction to learn (my younger sister who studies in primary 4th grade feels that too and often complains to me about these things).
2 Likes
I think to illustrate my point better I’ll just say this:
Just because the virus is something we aren’t used to, this doesn’t make it synthetic. If every strain of every virus was to act the same way then they wouldn’t be identified as different strains. This is a new strain that we don’t know much about, some people do display symptoms and some people don’t. This doesn’t make it a manufactured virus.
There can be any number of external and internal factors that can affect the way the virus affects you.
2 Likes
But that’s the case with flu. Me personally I almost died from flu. And they even say the vaccine doesn’t mean you won’t get it…
1 Like
I’ll leave some sources here. It’s an interesting read:
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/world/1300936/coronavirus-origin-china-news-covid19-cover-up-wuhan-laboratory-biological-warfare/amp
It’s very possible