Oh. I thought that was only if they attacked people or something. I honestly thought the first one was a statue.
Oh no, if they attack people its considered the fault of the Public. As they are technically Employed by the Crown the public are not suppose to feed or approach and are warned they will bite if they feel threatened.
Kinda like the Queens Guard
Ah, ok. George and the tv antennas was funny.
Right. I made sure to keep my distance because I was aware theyâd bite
https://forum.shanniiwrites.com/t/the-united-kingdom/14228
Since we shouldnât hijack someone elses topic Probably best move that discussion to the other topic I started.
Yeah, good idea. Sorry @lanafrazer!
Yes
Find me other supposedly normal countries that have guns as a legit thing people can just have if they want to
Yes.
For civilians, 100%. There is no need for a member of the general public to own a firearm. The only exception would be regulated shooting ranges (as in, they give you the gun and you have to return it before you leave).
I think USA should ban guns due to the Detroy town and city. Even what happens with cops shootings black peoples isnât the right choice.
noâŚ
I am pro gun lmao and Iâm aware thatâs a controversial opinion lol
Added discussion tag
No, I donât think guns should be banned as a whole. However, there should be stricter background checks for those who do try to purchase a gun
Not ban, but I think there should be heavy restrictions. Like why would a civilian need a machine gun?
also, I agree with this. ^^
Closed due to inactivity