Oh yeah, I remember their names being always used together, so when you said Margaret was getting married, I thought maybe Margo and Archie’s name being used together was because people shipped them, not cuz they were siblings …
I mean that stuff did happen but icky
1 Like
Between cousins maybe, not between brother and sister (Thank God, it’d be hard romancing the Regency era if incest would’ve been common)
1 Like
I feeeel like the other one was Emmanuel and someone but idk if that’s happening anymore
1 Like
Yeah gross
yeah, there is
1 Like
Right. They’re just commoners to everyone else. No title.
2 Likes
Hold on a minute, they are not commoners. Not having a title doesn’t make them commoners
1 Like
Compared to those that have a title. They still have money.
1 Like
Would you say Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy is common?
1 Like
I have no idea.
1 Like
Whaaat? You don’t know Pride and Prejudice?
1 Like
Nothing idkk :(((
2 Likes
I mean…it kinda does tho
1 Like
No it doesn’t, because if you aren’t part of the peerage, but have money and land, you’re part of the gentry, and if you have a job ( that isn’t in law, military or church) and rent your place of living then you’re common. If you have even less than that you’re poor.
I think its a matter of perspective tho
they dont have titles so to the ton they may be viewed as commoners
doesn’t make them necessarily correct tho
3 Likes
^ this
I feel like titled vs not is more important to the nobility than who does or doesn’t own land
2 Likes
True … Except for the men who have titles and need money ofc, because you can always have high standing and a title and be broke
1 Like
I’ve heard of it.
1 Like
Yeah٫I’m saying because they don’t have titles.
1 Like