Writing Diversity: Share Your Biggest Anxieties!

I disagree completely. Every single author puts their political and social views in their work. Especially the most successful authors! I mean, if you’re trying to be unbiased, what exactly is your story saying? What is the point of it? It’s like saying a whole lot of nothing.

Look at some of the most successful novels. The Lord of the Rings. Narnia. Jane Eyre. The Picture of Dorian Gray. A Fault in Our Stars, even… they all have something to say. A point to make.

If stories were unbiased and impartial, if what they had to say didn’t matter, there would be no point in making writers aware of diversity and toxic messages because they wouldn’t have any messages and diversity wouldn’t do anything. No writer needs to be objective.

7 Likes

Semi-neutral, not completely neutral. It’s impossible to be 100% neutral in a story.

For example, the Merchant of Venice by Shakespeare is about anti-Semitism in Italy. Yet, Shakespeare held anti-Semitic beliefs. Most of his works (at least in a feminist perspective) portrayed women badly. The thing is, was it his personal beliefs or society’s beliefs at the time?

I say this because, when you’re completely biased it will lead to some kind of misrepresentation. Birth of a Nation, the film. Perfect example of the combo of society’s beliefs and the creator’s beliefs. It illustrated that black people were bad and that the KKK were “white saviors”.

Another example can be most of Tyler Perry’s films. They also portray black women badly. The reason for this is because he had trauma with a black woman (his mother I think) when he was young. Despite this, his films are extremely successful.

You mentioned the Narnia series. Great point. The series had religious motifs throughout all 7 books. In “The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe”, Jadis is the main villain. Why is this so? We don’t know. But again, interpret it through a feminist lens and it’ll make much more sense.

My last example will be majority of episode’s “famous” stories. They have white, able-bodied, female characters as the protagonists. Often, they are the quintessential American girl- Protestant Christian, sort of religious, either blonde or a brunette, feminine. And often, these kinds of stories are romance and drama. They have multiple YA fiction tropes in it and, again, misrepresent other cultures, religions and races, like blacks, Italians, Hispanics/Latinos, Muslims, Jews and more. When people call them out for it, do they stop and learn how to represent correctly? No. Because we keep seeing these kinds of stories all the time. It’s like a cycle. It’s systemic.

And where do they get these stereotypes from? Their society. The world around you influences your art. We see these stereotypes pushed onto us in the media and in literature.

To connect back to my thesis, being semi-neutral is the best option for being a writer since our world influences us the most. By “semi”, I mean 35 to about… 50% neutral. Of course we’re going to have political, racial, sexual, cultural… Any type of bias. It will always be there. But it’s up to us to learn how to not let it completely affect our work as writers.

(God, that was long. I hope it was informative enough and that I made sense. :slight_smile:)

9 Likes

Woah

2 Likes

Is that a good thing? :flushed::yellow_heart::chocolate_bar:

1 Like

I disagree with the basis of your thesis, though I agree with all the working you did here. The solution isn’t to become more neutral (centrism and fence-sitting makes for incredibly boring reads), it’s to be persuasive. To be more political, and to be more biased, just in the opposite direction. Neutrality gets you nowhere, having faith in your own beliefs gets you everywhere.

If you’re neutral in your writing, the toxic messaging, bad cliche-ridden diversity-less stories won’t go anywhere, but if you push back against it, you’ll actually be standing for something.

Also semi-neutral isn’t a thing, if you’re semi-neutral, you lean one way. That’s how a spectrum works >.<

4 Likes

And I doubt he even came across Jewish people, considering the fact that there were no Jews in Britain when he was alive since Edward 1 banished all Jews in 1290.

4 Likes

Yes, exactly.

Again, giving great food for thought… ooh, I don’t think I have that much to say. You’re right.

I mean, when it comes to mass media, at least in the USA, it’s heavily biased (CNN, MSNBC) and that causes a lot of debate with “the other side” (channels like Fox News). Heavy bias really just doesn’t do much.

I am now sitting in front of the computer trying to come up with something that can go with your point.

3 Likes

Again, the play took place in Italy and if you read it, there’s a lot of anti-Semitic language.

Still, there was Antisemitism in Elizabethan England due to Jewish-to-Christian converts who still faced prejudice.

3 Likes

From what I know, The Merchant of Venice’s author was inspired by the Anti-Semitic play The Jew of Malta, which portrays the Jew as evil who only wants to do bad and harm.

3 Likes

That, I didn’t know.

2 Likes

On topic: Well, I don’t have any anxieties when it comes to making a diverse cast. I just hope that I will do it right.

2 Likes

This has nothing to do with how biased he is. This is just an analysis of why he’s biased, not how.

What you’re describing here is bigotry. Just because you aren’t a bigot, it doesn’t mean you aren’t biased. People who write perceptions that are popular today are still biased. They’re just biased in the way you are so you don’t notice it. There is no such thing as unbiased writing.

Interpretation and bias are two different things. Your interpretation and the authors interpretations are naturally going to be two different things, but that doesn’t make one interpretation more correct than the other. Interpretations are brought forth by biased, but being able to interpret a piece of work in multiple different ways doesn’t make it less biased.

None of what you’re describing is becoming less biased. It’s your bias that makes you believe that things like The Birth of a Nation are bad. Everyone has a bias and everyone puts it in their writing. Everyone has a bias and everyone reads writing with that bias. I think you’re confusing definitions here.

5 Likes

And having a bias that’s more morally correct than someone else’s bias doesn’t make it less biased. It’s just the morally correct bias. Bias is a neutral word. We all have one. It’s about making sure you have one that doesn’t hurt other people.

5 Likes

Signed, an English literature tutor.

4 Likes

In regards to this, if you had a bias that did hurt other people would you still include it in your writing knowing it would hurt others?

3 Likes

My opinion is that someone who knows that their bias is discriminatory and doesn’t assess it and learn from their bigotry probably doesn’t care much about other people’s feelings anyway

4 Likes

My biggest anxiety is that I try my best to represent everyone right, not going for stereotypes and everyone are just people but everyone just tells me that I’m being racist ect…

3 Likes

I definitely understand your points above. Amazing, by the way, but, umm…

Can you elaborate this? Like give examples?

2 Likes

If someone knows their views are inherently transphobic, for example, and doesn’t care to educate themselves, they probably don’t care much for trans people

5 Likes

Ohh, ok.

Thank you very much!

2 Likes