Thatâs worse then.
Anonymity is a defense in itself.
Thatâs worse then.
Anonymity is a defense in itself.
So what would you have expected them to do to get a new subforum? They probably saw it as easier to make an own forum than to make a subforum. This is what should be the worrying part. If it were easy enough to get a sub forum that would make them happy, they wouldnât feel the need to create an own forum.
That still doesnât mean that they are allowed to ignore and break the rules, but that should be something we should probably think about
Nope. I wouldnât get involved in that way if I knew them because Iâd just talk to them privately.
If we cared about every random anonymous confessor, duckling, you wouldnât be on the team.
Do you really think I wouldnât report someone who broke the rules?
You donât have to care about random confessors. But about those who are serious and not just trolls
I wouldnât make a judgment like that.
I find it frankly concerning that this has all gone on as long as it has, trying to rationalise it in some way. You want emotionless pragmatism, here it is.
We should shut down anonymous confessions, all they lead to is hassle
But people enjoy them, so that would be a bad idea. Iâll just happily give the rational take here
Some faceless goon doesnât get to decide what is and isnât acceptable. We have said many times that you forfeit your right to be treated like a member of the forums when giving anonymous confessions, here epsecially, because you donât even need an account.
I donât really care how any of you feel on the matter, and I donât care that someoneâs poor little fee-fees were hurt. If they canât take it, either post publically like the rest of us or leave
Excuse me? Youâre arguing against an argument I never made. I never once said that not reading the rules means that someone doesnât care. In fact, I said this:
This is completely irrelevant. I havenât just explained why Iâm against rival forums in wishy-washy confessions. The rules are very fair and clear on that AND I have constantly told people, without getting mad, why I have to shut down their threads because they break the rules. It doesnât take rocket science to understand why rival forums would hurt the forums and Iâve made that clear in the rules and throughout the forums.
Thatâs their problem. If they donât bother with the rules and they break them, it doesnât protect them from consequences. They should have read the rules. Theyâre there for a reason.
I absolutely disagree with this. Absolutely. If the person had originally made a thread instead of an anonymous confession, things would have been different. But even more than that, letâs look at my original response:
Completely fair. I explained the problem. Explained the issue I have with it. What do we have a problem with? My tone? The jokes I made a little later? That would be tone policing. As I said, people trying to invalidate my response by breaking the rules themselves. And invalidating my feelings on the matter.
Both of these responses are hilarious. If I treated this like a business, I would pretty much shut down anyone who so much as breathed a complaint about the forums. Iâd probably automate the anonymous confessions to get rid of any confessions like these immediately and crush anyone who threatened the money. People would complain a lot more about that. Me not treating this like a business means that I can give you the human reasons for my reactions, instead of putting money before my users.
If you make your own forum, you are jeopardising the Forums. Itâs as simple as that. Itâs not a suggestion. We have a whole category for suggestions. Itâs rivalry. Itâs trying to take traffic away from the Forums, whether they liked it or not. Ascribing things that the confessor âprobablyâ thought is dumb. They could have easily just âprobablyâ not thought at all. In fact, based on their apology, it seems a lot more likely that they just didnât think about the effect that their actions would have on others. which I said â no hard feelings. just donât do it again.
I am a person. These forums matter a great deal to me and my feelings matter. Yet both of these responses are actively telling me that I need to push my personal feelings aside:
This is exactly what I mean when I say that I have to fight just for my feelings to be valid on this place. Just because I made this place â a place I made partially so Iâd have somewhere to talk to friends too, I have to put anonymous people above myself?
No. I make my mental health very clear so you know about it. Thatâs all I owe anyone. The forums are my baby and they will disappear if I donât take care of myself. The answer is a bit of compassion from everyone to everyone, not trying to force me to be the âbigger personâ.
This is why I brought up mental health. Since people decided to open up old wounds, all theyâve done is tell me that my feelings are less valid because I own the forums.
The confessor did something wrong. I responded with annoyance, upset and frustration. They apologised. I left it as that. Then people came along and told me that I had no right to be upset. So yes. Itâs wrong.
I think we can leave it here, tbh
That would be against the rules because it would break the free speech rules. People are allowed to complain as long as they donât break the rules.
But the person here broke the rules, so you could have just removed the confession and moved on.
Of course youâre still allowed to have emotions, but the way you made it sound is as if everyone who doesnât 100% agree with you is trying to attack you or at least thatâs how it sounded to me. (This is low-key tone policing and Iâm sorry for that, I just donât know how to otherwise explain why I reacted the way I did, feel free to remove this after reading if it breaks the rules the way I formulated it)
Iâm sorry for making this issue even bigger than it is. I just felt like everyone was being treated unfairly here, including Shannii and the confessor.
There are no free speech rules, duckling. Because if there were, the hate speech, trigger warning and other rules would go against them. Plus, I make the rules. I could literally work that into the rules, just like Episode. Thatâs what businesses do. They put profit before people.
Okay, Iâm done with replying to this, because it feels like I donât get your point and you donât get mine. If thereâs anything I misunderstood and you still feel like explaining to me, just DM me. I donât want to cause more misunderstanding and drama
Each time I talk about whatâs going on in my life, I do it because Iâm not a business. I do it so you know why I canât post as much or why I need some help with he finances or why I donât tolerate rival Forums.
How do businesses work so professionally? Well, they have a whole team of people who are there just to put the forums first and make sure they donât lose money. So, when someone threatens the forums, they can act quickly. They also have enough people that they can buffer any upset or heartbreak that the owner feels. CEOs arenât robots. They throw stuff and get sad and upset. The thing is, though, they usually have someone there for them â a secretary â who can listen to what they have to say and then filter their upset through a corporate filter. So you donât see the upset and frustration. You get someone whoâs divorced from the situation writing a statement. I donât have that.
I mightâve misunderstood this then:
Thatâs true.
I guess, but in my opinion this escalated way too much. I understand that there are consequences for breaking the rules, but Iâm not sure how a confessor would get punished for that.
I wanna reply more, but honestly this seems to be completely based on a personâs views. There really arenât facts and both sides are valid and have their own opinions. I donât know what to add, because I already completely understand your side of the argument. Iâm just going to go back to keeping my opinions to myself, because I really have no energy to continue this. I donât think I can say much when arguing against the heads, and a lot of people are afraid to speak up for that reason.
I think we can leave it here, tbh
Yeah, I donât think thereâs much more to add.
Just that I completely agree with @Duckling.
Well Iâm not a head so I guess they can stop being weenies